14 May 201420 May 2014 Politics Budget 2014: putting the con in economy Alex Mitchell The Abbott Government’s first budget, like most federal budgets, is based on a confidence trick. But this one has been executed with such bumbling incompetence that it won’t fly with the electorate. The budget’s narrative is the hoary old claim that ‘all Australians will share the pain’ in restoring the national economy. But a simple examination of the budget papers demonstrates this isn’t true: the heaviest burden falls on the lowest paid, middle earners, students, unemployed and older citizens. The millionaire and billionaire class, the top one per cent, escape with a contribution amounting to small change. Adding to the anger of voters, Abbott and his ministers are sticking to the line that they have not broken their election promises. Every time this is repeated on radio or television, Abbott’s popularity rating sinks. Is continued deniability a sustainable option? The Coalition harnessed a raft of spinmeisters and PR gurus to make the budget ‘saleable’ by attaching bells and whistles, such as the Medical Research Future Fund and a $50 billion Infrastructure Fund. The purpose of these headline-grabbing items is to hide: 1) the cruel attack on living standards of working people and 2) the wrecking of the social services that protect poorer households from the poverty line. The 2014–15 budget has to be seen as the first in a succession of Coalition budgets to reshape the economy, introducing a US-style free market model and burying the mixed economy with its vital public sector. When Treasurer Joe Hockey told Parliament, ‘There’s still much work to be done’, he wasn’t kidding. Next May he will advance the second stage of his attack with the privatisation of public assets such as the Post Office, the Royal Australian Mint, Crown land and public utilities. Another purpose is to starve the States and Territories of funds for education and health and force them into an unholy alliance to demand an increase in the GST – which Abbott will take to the next election. The Coalition is gambling that there will be no major upsets in the world economy over the next couple of years (neither the IMF nor the World Bank are prepared to make such a risky forecast) and that Bill Shorten’s Opposition will be unable to mount a coherent strategy to reclaim government at the 2016 election (a safe bet). The budget’s credibility sank the day that Tony Abbott announced a 12-month pay freeze on the salaries of MPs and senators. Just think about that: a 12-month pay freeze. Workers all over the country are taking pay cuts to hang onto their jobs while there are 713,000 workers currently unemployed. Sharing the pain? Give me a break – a pay freeze is existential to them. As ever, the biggest game-changer is the hike in petrol prices. It seriously impacts on the cost of living of every tradie, farmer, small business operator and average working families. And every time prices go up in Coles and Woolworths, shoppers will be reminded of Abbott, his gouging budget and broken promises. What’s becoming ever-clearer is that this is an extremely conservative government led by a religious and political dogmatist. Australian voters aren’t used to that and they don’t like it. After only eight months in office, Abbott and his barmy lieutenants – George Brandis, Christopher Pyne, Eric Abetz, Julie Bishop, Joe Hockey and Bronwyn Bishop – are causing deep disquiet among voters and the Coalition now occupies an election-losing position in some opinion polls. The budget will only increase the electorate’s gathering suspicion of the Coalition, exacerbate social divisions and undermine Abbott’s demonic hold on the prime ministership. Meanwhile, the leadership pretenders – Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Immigration Minister Scott Morrison – are both watching Abbott’s gamble with vigilant interest. Alex Mitchell Alex Mitchell is former state political editor of Fairfax Media's Sunday newspaper in Sydney, The Sun-Herald, and author of Come The Revolution: A Memoir (NewSouth Books, 2011). More by Alex Mitchell Overland is a not-for-profit magazine with a proud history of supporting writers, and publishing ideas and voices often excluded from other places. If you like this piece, or support Overland’s work in general, please subscribe or donate. Related articles & Essays 2 First published in Overland Issue 228 24 January 202325 January 2023 Politics The end of the politics of care Giovanni Tiso The daily spectacle of televised briefings was not unique to New Zealand, and it may simply be the case that Ardern thrived when given the opportunity to speak to the public directly—in other words, that she was better than others at it. Alternatively, we could say that her rhetoric found in the pandemic the ground on which to turn into concrete action. Either way, the benefits we derived in terms of lives saved from the remarkable extension of that social license are literally incalculable. First published in Overland Issue 228 15 December 202216 December 2022 Politics Let them vote Sam Wallman At sixteen years old you're old enough to die in a war, have worked for two years, drive a car, leave school, pay taxes, get married, secure public housing, vote in over 15 other countries, have an existential crisis. Let 16+ year olds vote!