Published 17 March 201421 March 2014 · Politics / Activism Marching orders? Carla Silbert and Bec Zajac March in March – a stream of protests demonstrating a ‘vote of no confidence’ in government policies – has taken place across Australia over the past three days. Organised almost entirely through social media networks, the marches saw 100,000 people turn out nationally to take part in a demonstration against government decisions that undermine principles of social justice and responsible global citizenship. People around the country rallied because of government policies on climate change, asylum seekers and marriage equality. But the protests had a local tone, too. In Melbourne, the estimated crowd of 30,000 spoke about Victoria’s new anti-protest ‘move-on’ powers and the dismal treatment of the Morwell community following the recent mine fire. Those gathered at Treasury Gardens at the conclusion of the march heard speakers address national issues such as refugee policy and the national broadband network, as well as local challenges facing unions and childcare workers. This broad range of issues attracted a diverse group of protesters. Marchers included teachers, health-care workers and farmers, who have since taken to social media to tweet their professions to counter scepticism that the protesters were simply a ‘rabble of hippies’. Families marched alongside school groups and civil society organisations. Some came with placards protesting a specific concern such as CSG fracking or threats to Medicare. A more general disapproval in government policies was reflected in the chants echoing through the city of ‘We deserve better’ and ‘Not in my name’. Overall, the rallies had the feeling of a community disillusioned with how it is being governed and determined to be heard. The huge turnout has prompted a wide range of media coverage. While it’s too soon to say what kind of pressure it may put on ministers and policymakers, perhaps this is a protest movement that is just getting started. Carla Silbert Carla Silbert is a Melbourne-based writer and policy adviser. Her work is focused on social justice and gender equality. More by Carla Silbert › Bec Zajac Bec Zajac is Overland’s publicity officer. She is also a Master of Journalism student at the University of Melbourne and a broadcaster at 3CR community radio. She has published in Overland, New Matilda, Brooklyn Rail and The Age. More by Bec Zajac › Overland is a not-for-profit magazine with a proud history of supporting writers, and publishing ideas and voices often excluded from other places. If you like this piece, or support Overland’s work in general, please subscribe or donate. Related articles & Essays 11 June 202612 June 2026 · Solidarity The zero-sum state: what the Royal Commission reveals on the future of Muslim life in Australia Sara Cheikh Husain The zero-sum logic that the Royal Commission’s witnesses have voiced through the IHRA definition is a colonial act of oppression. If the state succumbs to that logic, as every indication suggests it will, Muslim political solidarity with Palestine risks becoming not merely unrecognised but structurally criminalised. The full institutional protection of one community will come to be constitutively built on the misrecognition of another. 5 29 May 202629 May 2026 · Politics Zionism in real-time: insights from the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion Nick Riemer While the Royal Commission sits, Israel continues to murder and starve Gazans as they try somehow to survive. Since the genocide is, indisputably, the necessary overarching context for a discussion of antisemitism in Australia at the present moment, it is perverse that the Commission has refused to hear from the Palestine solidarity movement.