Published 2 February 202417 February 2024 · open letter / Palestine Open Letter to the Australian government regarding the ICJ provisional measures ruling International Legal Scholars Against Genocide 31 January 2024 To the Prime Minister, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Minister for Defence and Attorney General As Australian and/or Australian-based scholars and practitioners of international law, conflict studies and genocide studies, we call on the Australian government to act without delay to ensure it is compliant with its international obligations in light of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling on 26 January 2024 in the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel). In an almost unanimous ruling, the ICJ found that it was “plausible” that the State of Israel was in violation of its obligations under Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Although this finding is not prejudicial to the Court’s decision on the merits, it puts every state, including Australia, on notice about the potential legal implications of their ongoing relations with the State of Israel. Ongoing cooperation with Israel may amount to complicity with genocide. The prohibition of genocide is a jus cogens norm of supreme moral and political importance. It protects not only individuals but also human groups and humanity as a whole from the moral disaster of collective annihilation. The legal and moral significance of this prohibition means that all states must exercise a heightened level of caution. The International Court of Justice “consider[ed] that the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip is at serious risk of deteriorating further” (para 72) and thus ordered the State of Israel to comply with six provisional measures. Foremost, the State of Israel must “take all measures within its power to prevent the commission” of acts of genocide. The Court also ordered that the State of Israel to “take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address the adverse conditions of life faced by Palestinians in the Gaza Strip”. We note that this measure is worded in a strong and unambiguous manner: it creates an obligation of result, not merely of conduct. Additionaly, the court ordered the State of Israel to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide, to prevent the destruction and ensure the preservation of evidence and to report to the Court within one month. Although the ICJ did not formally order a ceasefire, it is clear that current military operations may amount to genocide. Complying with the Court’s provisional measures at least requires a large reduction in civilian deaths from combat, disease or starvation, and thus arguably requires both a ceasefire and ample humanitarian aid. So far it is difficult to see in news reports any change in the conduct of the State of Israel: civilian casualty numbers remain extremely high with 339 Palestinians reportedly killed and 600 Palestinians reportedly injured between the afternoons of 26 and 28 January 2024. The ICJ’s ruling that it is “plausible” that the State of Israel is violating the Genocide Convention has important legal implications for Australia. As a signatory to the Genocide Convention, Australia has binding international obligations to prevent and punish genocide, conspiracy to commit genocide, incitement to genocide and complicity in genocide. The obligation to prevent genocide arises “the instant that the state learns of, or should normally have learned of, the existence of a serious risk that genocide will be committed.” (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro (2007)). Given the ICJ ruling, all states are now on notice of this risk. To ensure compliance with international obligations, and to avoid complicity in violations of the Genocide Convention, we call on the Australian government to: Call on the State of Israel to comply with the ICJ’s provisional measures ruling in full; Halt any export of arms and arms components to Israel, suspend defence industry partnerships with Israel and ensure that intelligence from Pine Gap is not being provided to the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) to inform its military operations in Gaza; Warn any Australian citizen who is fighting with the IDF that their actions may contribute to genocidal acts, and investigate and prosecute Australian nationals for involvement in potential war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and torture, as well as any acts which potentially breach the binding ICJ orders; Immediately reinstate funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) which was suspended on 27 January 2024. UNRWA is the main organisation providing aid, shelter and food to Palestinians in Gaza. The ICJ noted that over 1.4 million Palestinian in Gaza who have been forced to leave their homes are sheltering at UNRWA facilities, which are already “overcrowded and unsanitary” (para 49). There have been warnings for weeks about the “severe risk of collapse of the humanitarian system” in Gaza. Without international funding UNRWA’s desperately needed humanitarian work could “collapse any time now”. The UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food has warned that international funding cuts to UNRWA mean that famine in Gaza is “inevitable”. Such action to suspend aid during this critical time, is arguably a form of “collective punishment” of the civilian population of Gaza and undermines binding ICJ orders for “immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance”. A failure to reinstate UNRWA funding risks making Australia directly complicit in violating article 2(c) of the Genocide Convention by “deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”. Australia must treat the risk of being complicit in genocide and directly contributing to genocide with the utmost seriousness. The Government must act immediately to ensure it is compliant with its obligations under the Genocide Convention and the ICJ’s provisional measures order. A failure to do so would signal that Australia and other western governments are no longer committed to the international rule of law or the prevention and prohibition of genocide. Ignoring the ICJ’s call carries a real risk of Australia’s complicity in genocide against Palestinians, as well as the risk of Australia’s complicity in the disintegration of the norm against genocide itself. Yours sincerely, 1. Dr Ntina Tzouvala, ANU College of Law 2. Professor Lucas Lixinski, UNSW Sydney 3. Dr Claerwen O’Hara, La Trobe Law School, La Trobe University 4. Dr Jordana Silverstein, University of Melbourne 5. Dr Balawyn Jones, La Trobe University 6. Dr Tamsin Phillipa Paige, Deakin Law School 7. Dr Ghena Krayem, University of Sydney 8. Dr Rachel Killean, University of Sydney 9. Dr Wanshu Cong, Australian National University 10. Dr Elizabeth Hicks, University of Münster 11. Associate Professor Erin Fitz-Henry, University of Melbourne 12. Dr Laura Griffin, La Trobe University 13. Dr Erin O’Donnell, University of Melbourne Law School 14. Ms Sumedha Choudhury, Melbourne Law School 15. Dr Souheir Edelbi, Western Sydney University 16. Professor Dianne Otto, Melbourne Law School 17. Mr Dylan Asafo, University of Melbourne 18. Dr Martin Clark, La Trobe Law School 19. Professor Sarah Joseph, Griffith University 20. Dr Ozlem Susler, La Trobe University 21. Dr Julia Dehm, La Trobe University 22. Professor Ben Golder, UNSW 23. Mr Haris Jamil, University of Melbourne 24. Ms Sahiba Maqbool, La Trobe University 25. Professor Sundhya Pahuja, University of Melbourne 26. Associate Professor Jessica Whyte, University of New South Wales 27. Dr Lana Tatour, University of New South Wales 28. Associate Professor Jasmine Westendorf, La Trobe University 29. Mr Siddharth Narrain, Adelaide Law School, University of Adelaide 30. Ms Anna Saunders, University College London 31. Ms Kate Jama, Melbourne Law School 32. Associate Professor Matthew Zagor, Australian National University College of Law 33. Dr Divya Garg, RMIT University 34. Dr Richard Joyce, Faculty of Law, Monash University 35. Dr Noam Peleg, University of New South Wales 36. Dr Coel Kirkby, University of Sydney 37. Dr Marika Sosnowski, University of Melbourne 38. Dr Sophie Rigney, RMIT University 39. Professor Jessie Hohmann, University of Technology Sydney 40. Associate Professor Tanja Dreher, UNSW 41. Associate Professor Maria Giannacopoulos, Director Centre for Criminology Law and Justice, University of New South Wales 42. Dr Brian Cuddy, Macquarie University 43. Dr Edwin Bikundo, Griffith Law School 44. Professor Luke Glanville, Australian National University 45. Dr Joanna Kyriakakis, Monash University 46. Dr Emma Palmer, Griffith University 47. Dr André Dao, Melbourne Law School 48. Professor Luis Eslava, La Trobe University 49. Dr Ihab Shalbak, University of Sydney 50. Dr Adil Hasan Khan, Melbourne Law School 51. Dr Simon McKenzie, Griffith Law School 52. Dr Sara Dehm, University of Technology Sydney 53. Dr Lauren Nishimura, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne 54. Associate Professor of International Law Megan Donaldson, University College London 55. Associate Professor Crystal McKinnon, University of Melbourne 56. Dr Bree Carlton, University of Melbourne 57. Dr Sahar Ghumkhor, University of Melbourne 58. Dr Shannon Woodcock, University of Melbourne 59. Chief Executive Officer Nerita Waight, Victorian Aboriginal Legal Service 60. Dr Charlotte Mertens, University of Melbourne 61. Associate Professor Juliet Rogers, Criminology, University of Melbourne 62. Associate Professor Ramona Vijeyarasa, University of Technology Sydney 63. Dr Laura Bedford, University of Melbourne 64. Emeritus Professor Andrea Durbach, University of New South Wales 65. Associate Professor Bianca Fileborn, University of Melbourne 66. Dr Amanda Porter, University of Melbourne 67. Emeritus Professor David Dixon, The University of New South Wales 68. Dr Dave McDonald, University of Melbourne 69. Professor Alison Young, University of Melbourne 70. Associate Professor Diana Johns, The University of Melbourne 71. Dr Andrew Brooks, UNSW 72. Ms Sonia Qadir, UNSW 73. Dr Emma Russell, La Trobe University 74. Dr Randi Irwin, University of Newcastle 75. Dr Claire Loughnan, University of Melbourne 76. Dr Shih Joo Tan, University of Melbourne 77. Associate Professor Nesam McMillan, University of Melbourne 78. Dr Kathryn Greenman, University of Technology Sydney 79. Professor Amanda Wise, Macquarie University 80. Professor Douglas Guilfoyle, UNSW Canberra 81. Ms Caitlin Murphy, Melbourne Law School 82. Associate Professor Cristy Clark, University of Canberra 83. Dr Holly Doel-Mackaway, Macquarie University 84. Dr Dara Conduit, University of Melbourne 85. Dr Lucia Sorbera, The University of Sydney 86. Dr Liyana Kayali, University of Sydney 87. Dr Caitlin Biddolph, University of Sydney 88. Ms Cassandra Seery, University of Melbourne 89. Associate Professor Amy Barrow, Macquarie University 90. PhD (ABD) Binish Ahmed, Policy Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University 91. Ms Scheherazade Bloul, Deakin University 92. Professor Thalia Anthony, Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney 93. Dr Michael Griffiths, University of Wollongong 94. Dr. José-Manuel Barreto, Javeriana University, Bogotá 95. Mr Tim Lindgren, University of Melbourne 96. Mr Adil Akram, Informit 97. Dr Tor Krever, University of Cambridge 98. Dr Katrin Travouillon, Australian National University 99. Mr Samir Batshon, IE Aust. 100. Ms Mariam Ibrahim 101. Dr. Lina Koleilat, Australian National University 102. Dr Adam Masri, Deakin University 103. Mr Ian Curr, 4PR – Voice of the People 104. Professor Anthony Burke, UNSW 105. Dr Randa Abdel-Fattah, Macquarie University 106. Professor Raihan Ismail, University of Oxford 107. Professor Emeritus Kim Economides, Flinders University 108. Professor Susan Harris Rimmer, Griffith University 109. Ms. Olga Prokopis, Deakin University 110. Dr Melathi Saldin, Deakin University 111. Dr Dylan Holdsworth, Deakin University 112. Dr Tom Sandercock, Deakin University 113. Associate Professor, Fengshi Wu, UNSW 114. Mr Pathmanathan, National Bolts Pty Ltd 115. Mr Brett Healion, Member of the Public 116. Sophia Malin Araújo Almeida, CCLS 117. Professor Mohamad Abdalla, Centre for Islamic Thought and Education 118. Dr Amireh Fakhouri, University of Melbourne 119. Ms Samiya Malik, APAN 120. Associate Professor Trace Ollis, Deakin University 121. Associate Professor Maree Pardy, Deakin University 122. Associate Professor Jonathan Symons, Macquarie University 123. Dr Astrid Lorange, UNSW 124. Ms Filzah Rahmat, NA 125. Mr Zaqy Alfaiz, NA 126. Dr Rosemary Kelly, Medical Association for the Prevention of War 127. Dr Meribah Rose, La Trobe Law School 128. Dr Cait Storr, University of Melbourne 129. Senior Research Fellow Hadeel Abdelhameed, Monash University 130. Associate Professor Jeanine Leane, University of Melbourne 131. Dr Daniele Fulvi, Western Sydney University 132. Dr Alba Rosa Boer Cueva, The University of Sydney 133. Mr Tony Barta, La Trobe University 134. Associate Professor Melanie O’Brien, University of Western Australia 135. Dr Carolyn Adams, Macquarie Law School, Macquarie University 136. Professor Kiran Grewal, Goldsmiths, University of London 137. Dr Thomas Gibson International Legal Scholars Against Genocide We acknowledge that we live and work on stolen lands of Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people and respect that sovereignty of those lands was never ceded. We pay respects to Elders, past and present, and recognise the violence of ongoing genocide in this country. More by International Legal Scholars Against Genocide › Overland is a not-for-profit magazine with a proud history of supporting writers, and publishing ideas and voices often excluded from other places. If you like this piece, or support Overland’s work in general, please subscribe or donate. Related articles & Essays 6 December 20246 December 2024 · Palestine The movement for Palestine is now… Sam Wallman "The movement for Palestine is now stronger, smarter, louder and better connected than ever before." (Noura Mansour) 29 November 2024 · Climate politics Pacific nations can’t afford to be hypocrites on human rights Kavita Naidu In the Pacific, we know that climate change is exacerbating a human rights crisis. Our survival relies on the world following international law to limit the warming that threatens our people and shores. Yet the recent trajectory of Pacific governments picking and choosing which rights to defend and which to ignore is deeply troubling.