In the largest show of support for the Palestinian-initiated boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign so far in Australia, more than 350 persons marched on 29 July in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle – and in opposition to an attempt by Victorian Police to criminalise Palestine solidarity activism in Melbourne.
A month earlier, on 1 July, a similar, peaceful BDS action involving 120 persons was brutally attacked by the Victorian Police. Nineteen individuals were arrested.
Charged with ‘trespassing’ and ‘besetting,’ those arrested are now facing fines of up to AUD $30,000 (approximately US $32,300). The 1 July action, organised by the Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid, had sought to highlight the complicity of two Israeli companies, Jericho and Max Brenner Chocolate, with Israel’s occupation and apartheid policies. The action was the fourth protest against both companies since December 2010.
Jericho, located in Melbourne Central Shopping Centre and other shopping centres around the city, produces cosmetics made from minerals exploited from the Dead Sea. While Jericho and other Israeli companies – such as Ahava, also a target of BDS campaigns – profit from the Dead Sea, Palestinians are regularly denied access by Israel’s military checkpoints, exclusion zones and Israeli-only roads.
Max Brenner Chocolate, the other Israeli company subject to BDS protests in Melbourne, is owned by the Strauss Group – one of Israel’s largest food and beverage companies. On its website, the Strauss Group emphasises its support for the Israeli military, providing care packages, sports and recreational equipment, books and games for soldiers.
Strauss boasts support for the Golani and Givati Brigades, which were heavily involved in Israel’s military assault on the Gaza Strip in the Winter of 2008-09, which resulted in the killing of approximately 1,400 Palestinians, the majority civilians, including approximately 350 children. While Strauss has removed information about their support for the Golani and Givati brigades from their English language website, information about the company’s support for both brigades remains on their Hebrew language site.
BDS repression coordinated with Israeli government
Trade union and community representatives spoke at the rally on 29 July before the crowd marched through the city. In spite of repeated threats of mass arrests by Victoria Police – and the deployment of police horses in one of the shopping centres – the protest marched into both the Melbourne Central and Queen Victoria centres, staging peaceful sit-ins in front of the Max Brenner stores located within.
Two day earlier, on 27 July, the Victorian police confirmed during a bail variation hearing at the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria (local District Court) for some of the activists arrested on 1 July that a decision had been made to arrest the protesters before the demonstration. This decision was made after discussions with Zionist organisations, the Victorian government, shopping centre managements and state and national management of Max Brenner.
In April, the Australian Jewish News (AJN) reported that the Jewish Community Council of Victoria (JCCV) had made representations to the Victorian police. According to the AJN, JCCV president John Searle had ‘called on the police to stamp down harder on aggressive protesters’ (‘Police questioned as protests turn violent,’ 15 April 2011). Similar calls for a government and police crackdown on BDS protests against Max Brenner in Sydney were made in June by former AJN journalist Walt Secord, who is now a member of the NSW State Parliament (‘Police called to action on BDS,’ 24 June 2011).
On July 29, the same day as the BDS action against Max Brenner in Melbourne the Australian Jewish News carried a ‘debate’ piece between Vic Alhadeff, the CEO of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, and Ted Lapkin, a former staffer with the key pro-Israeli lobby group in Australia, the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council. The piece reveals that the various calls for police and government crackdown on BDS activism was part of a ‘nationally coordinated strategy’ developed with and backed by the Israeli Foreign Ministry (‘BDS: To protest or not to protest?’).
Arguing against any Zionist-organised BDS ‘counter’ protest, Alhadeff writes: ‘It is important for the community to be aware that our response to BDS forms part of [a] coordinated national strategy. Furthermore, this strategy is endorsed by counterparts abroad and Israel’s Foreign Ministry.’
Alhadeff outlined this coordinated national strategy in response to BDS, stating that it ‘included, but is not limited to, engagement with civil society and politicians, patronage of boycotted outlets, cooperation with police, shop owners and centre managers and exposure of the motives behind the BDS movement.’ According to Alhadeff, Zionist policy in response to BDS should be one which seeks to ‘speak softly’ but to also carry ‘a suggestion of a big stick.’
Activism leadership targeted
During cross-examination by Robert Stary, the lawyer representing the activists, Michael Beattie, an operational support inspector with the the Victorian Police, conceded that both Melbourne Central and Queen Victoria shopping centres were ‘public places’ and that neither centre prior to 1 July had sought any civil injunctions to prevent entry to the public places inside.
The cross-examination by Stary also revealed that the main reason that police had decided to criminalise the actions against the Israeli companies was because they had been well-organised, coordinated and effective.
Victorian Police acknowledged that the demonstrations had been peaceful, that solidarity activists hadn’t damaged property and there was no record of police or any member of the public being injured.
According to the testimony given by Inspector Beattie, the police had specifically sought to target the leadership of the protests, in particular those activists the police perceived as ‘operating a command and control function,’ in order to diminish the possibility of well-coordinated demonstrations – and to ensure ‘no protesters go to property and disrupt targeted business or additional businesses.’
According to Inspector Beattie, ‘the protesters had their own way’ for too long and a ‘decision [was] made to draw a line in the sand and make arrests.’ Another police officer, Senior Sargent Andrew Falconer, also gave testimony at the court hearing and acknowledged that police infiltrators had been sent to pro-Palestine solidarity meetings in order to monitor the activity of BDS activists.
In a statement issued after their arrests, the nineteen activists noted that ‘the attack on the peaceful BDS action in Melbourne highlights increasing attempts to criminalise BDS and Palestine solidarity activism internationally. Currently in the US, France and Greece, hundreds of pro-Palestine activists are facing criminal charges for nonviolently standing up for Palestinian human rights’ (‘Support the Boycott Israel 19 Defence Campaign’).
James Crafti, one of the activists arrested, told The Electronic Intifada that ‘the attempt by Israel and governments around the world to criminalise pro-Palestinian and BDS activism ignores the fact that the real criminal activity is being carried out by the Israeli state.’
‘Since its founding in 1948, Israel has sought to ethnically cleanse the indigenous Palestinian people through war, occupation and apartheid practices. Israel regularly engages in collective punishment, arbitrary arrests, extra-judicial assassinations and the demolition of Palestinian homes and civil infrastructure, all of which are illegal under international law,’ he added.
Crafti noted that while the Victorian and Australian governments sought to criminalise support for Palestine self-determination, they refused to hold Israel accountable for its human rights abuses, war crimes and apartheid policies.
All of the arrested activists who spoke to The Electronic Intifada said the police attack on the protest also highlighted the increasing repression of civil liberties and freedom of speech by the Victorian (conservative) Baillieu government.
One Palestine solidarity activist, Sue Bolton, who has been charged with ‘besetting’ (obstructing or hindering the right to enter, use or leave a premise), asserted that the police reaction to the action on 1 July was ‘over the top.’
‘There were massive numbers of police, well over a hundred, not counting those behind the scenes in the loading docks,’ she said.
According to Bolton, the Queen Victoria Centre loading docks had been cleared of delivery trucks, allowing the police to set up a processing unit and bring in prison transport trucks to be used as holding cells for those arrested.
Bolton described how police had sought to ‘kettle’ the demonstration by corralling protesters and physically pushing them into a smaller and smaller area. According to Bolton, this resulted in a number of protesters being injured and crushed when the police had surrounded and violently pushed protesters from all sides.
Similar tactics have been used by police forces in Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Finland and Denmark. The use of kettling by police in the UK against student protesters in November 2010 has led to legal challenges and the calling for a ban on the use of the tactic in the British High Court and the European Court of Human Rights.
Damian Ridgwell, another Palestine solidarity protester arrested on 1 July, told The Electronic Intifada that he had been standing away from the peaceful picket, speaking on a megaphone when three policemen grabbed him.
‘I was dragged behind police lines,’ Ridgwell said. ‘Once they grabbed me and started dragging me, I went limp and dropped to the ground … As I was being carried through the corridors of the loading dock, I lost consciousness because one of the police had me in a choke hold. I am not sure how long I was out, probably a few minutes. I woke up on the loading dock floor and heard the police saying I was “out”.’
Ridgwell, who was charged with trespassing, said ‘while it is outrageous we were arrested for peacefully demonstrating, our arrests have to be seen in the context of the Australia government’s support for Israel and its continued theft of Palestinian land … it’s important we don’t let the police intimidate protests like this. It is important to keep going with the protests and to keep supporting BDS.’
Australian government’s support of Israeli apartheid
Successive Australian governments, including the current Gillard government, have long supported Israel’s colonial and apartheid policies.
Current Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard signaled her uncritical support for Israel when she was still deputy Prime Minster of Australia. During the early days of Israel’s bombing of Gaza in the winter of 2008-09, she blamed Palestinians for Israel’s all-out assault, saying that Hamas must ‘renounce violence’ and that Israel had the ‘right to defend itself.’
During a visit to Israel In 2009, Gillard was thanked by Israeli government minister Isaac Herzog for standing ‘almost alone on the world stage in support of Israel’s right to defend itself’ (‘Israel to Gillard: thanks for standing by us,’ The Age, 24 June 2009).
The arrested activists noted that in June, the Baillieu government had established a new 42-member riot squad – and the attack on the 1 July protest was the first time it had been used in any significant way.
According to James Crafti, ‘the Victorian government thinks it can easily get away with attacking a pro-Palestine action because they think they can label us anti-Semitic.’ Crafti, who is Jewish, said that the police and those opposed to the BDS actions, however, ‘underestimate the sympathy towards both Palestine and the [Palestine solidarity] movement in the broader community.’
‘The amount of force used by the police and the response of the political elite to our protests, particularly the fact that the Australian Foreign Minister [and former Australian Prime Minister] Kevin Rudd felt the need to go a few days after our protest to Max Brenner as a public relations stunt is a sign of the pro-Israeli forces’ desperation,’ he added.
The eleven activists succeeded in changing the original bail conditions preventing them from entering either shopping centre (which also host medical clinics and a major train station) until the end of their case, to a lesser restriction of being prohibited from being within fifty metres of Max Brenner in both centres. However, Stary said he was still ‘anxious about the criminalisation of dissent.’
‘The police should not be used to protect the interests of an international commercial company,’ he said.
Building on the success of 29 July, Melbourne activists will continue to campaign in support of Palestinian rights and oppose the criminalisation of Palestine solidarity activism. The next Melbourne BDS action is scheduled for 9 September, the same week those arrested will plead not guilty to the charges against them. The defense campaign in support of the arrested activists has gained wide attention, with well-known public figures such as filmmaker John Pilger, author Norman Finkelstein and radical thinker Noam Chomsky supporting the campaign.
In a media release issued immediately following the success of the 29 July BDS action, Melbourne activists said the Victorian Police ‘thought that by attacking the BDS demonstration they would put an end to our movement. They were wrong … [we will] not be silenced’ (‘BDS returns to Max Brenner in spite of police intimidation,’ 5 August 2011).
Kim Bullimore has lived and worked in the West Bank of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. She is a member of the Melbourne Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid and a co-organiser of the first national Australian BDS conference, which took place in Melbourne in October 2010. Kim writes regularly on the Palestine-Israel conflict for the Australian newspaper, Direct Action. She has a blog at livefromoccupiedpalestine.blogspot.com
A defence fund has been started to help support the activists involved in this BDS action. Read more at Defend the Boycott Israel 19.