500px-Símbolo_de_Marinaleda_(Sevilla).svg
Type
Reflection
Category
Activism
Politics
Reading

Taking what’s ours

The Squatters’ Movement in Europe: Commons and Autonomy as Alternatives to Capitalism, Squatting Europe Kollective, Pluto Press, London, 2014

The Village Against the World, Dan Hancox, Verso, London, 2013

In general, the laws of capitalism protect the interests of property owners and big bosses, particularly the one per cent. As capitalism expands and intensifies, the laws multiply. Writers have difficulty claiming copyright and earning their just rewards. Australian federal court judges recently threw out an appeal from Cancer Voices Australia about a decision that DNA and RNA can be patented. Bailiffs turf you out when you stop paying your rent or mortgage off. If the bosses decide, thousands of us can be made redundant – essentially, forced not to work.

But capitalists’ exploitation of nature and people is the subject of increasing resistance, as life on earth is threatened by the climate change caused by capitalism. Two very readable recent books explore anti-capitalist practices: The Squatters’ Movement in Europe: Commons and Autonomy as Alternatives to Capitalism, written by scholar-activists of the Squatting Europe Kollective (SqEK) and edited by Claudio Cattaneo and Miguel Martínez López, and The Village Against the World by Dan Hancox.

The first is a pioneering work on a relatively neglected topic: squatting as a political action and to fulfil otherwise unmet needs for housing. Despite the book’s European focus, some chapters draw on examples from the US, with authors discussing the cultural diversity within squats, their meaning for our urban environmental crises and legal codes.

The observations and experiences are easily transferable, except that Australian squats are neither as extensive nor as visible: see the Australian Museum of Squatting created by squatter enthusiasts Iain McIntyre and Shane McGrath who run 3CR’s SUWA (Squatters and Unwaged Airwaves) show, and the international site Squat!net for SqEK and recent Australian news.

The second work is a journalistic account of an extended stay in Marinaleda, a village in southern Spain, east of Seville and north of Málaga, where – after a struggle to reappropriate their land – agriculture and local processing has been cooperatively worked for decades and mortgages are just 15 Euros per month. The town became particularly well-known internationally in mid-2012, when its charismatic revolutionary mayor Sánchez Gordillo led raids on supermarkets in Seville and Cádiz to satisfy locals made poor and hungry by austerity measures. After the Global Financial Crisis, Spain had been left Spain with unemployment levels of 25 per cent, and 34 per cent in the region of Andalusia surrounding Marinaleda (where, however, unemployment was only 5 per cent).

Together, these analyses represent practical examples of autonomous, self-managed spaces that portend post-capitalist futures. At the same time, both authors question whether such experiments lead to change or are simply havens.

I find discussions around the second issue particularly annoying for they almost invariably ignore that it is as much the fault of the context or external observer–critics that an experiment remains singular rather than serving as a model. It’s relevant to note the subtly distinct approaches of the authors – the one a collective of political activists explaining and reflecting on their practice, and the other an individual voice who probably sounds a little too much like sympathetic critics of Cuba. For instance, Hancox treats Mayor Sánchez Gordillo rather like Fidel Castro, as if the imagination and energy of the community relies on his leadership.

At the same time, Hancox is to be congratulated for his enjoyable rambles integrating the background of Spanish political and cultural revolutionary currents to explain the flowering of Marinaleda into a ‘communist utopia’. We get a cinematic sense of the town, its inhabitants, the Catholic and anti-clerical currents, the anarchist and socialist movements, the Guardia Civil, the feudal and Franco impositions. Hancox takes us into the fields and bars of Marinaleda. He shows how ‘work’ has dissolved from serving a local duke or doing what managers ask and being paid per hour, into decision-making over both political and productive spheres to meet basic needs and a good deal of volunteering, especially for communal celebratory, social activities. Hancox’s perfectly timed travels incorporate the uprising which has come to be known as 15-M. In mid-2011 the Indignados occupied Madrid’s Puerto del Sol square, and their protest against crisis austerity measures spread all over Spain, including to Barcelona, where skilled squatters settled like spiders building and re-building their webs over its central square for literally months on end.

Likewise, one of the key achievements of the SqEK is to acknowledge the importance of context in a collection that seeks thematic continuity through a sequence of contrasts and comparisons between nations, and cities such as London, Paris, Madrid, Berlin, New York City, Amsterdam and Rome. Squatters impact on urban environments through outreach such as social centres, with cultural to gardening foci, through modelling strident opposition to private property and the police who protect them, through hosting artistic programs and creative entertainments, through supporting the erstwhile evicted and homeless (including migrants and refugees), through creating pop-up workshops (say, mending bikes) and extensive communities that experiment with open, free, democratic, tolerant and sharing practices prefiguring non-capitalist ways to relate and value one another and nature.

The SqEK analysis is bookended by the cultural and political events of 1968 and the recent criminalisation of squatters, which occurred at different points of time in different countries and has been differentially implemented (or not) and responded to by squatters in a variety of ways. Thus we read of squats broken by raids sometimes leading to deaths and other times involving literally thousands of police. Yet squatters forcefully evicted – or abandoning their squats just in time –often simply settle somewhere else, reinhabiting the urban landscape.

As SqEK points out, the data on squatting is sparse and hardly does justice to measuring their effect. Their illegality means incomplete formal counts, which need to account for rotation in and out of squats to represent all involved: the students, the artists, the migrants, the culturally- disaffected, the racially-persecuted, the socially-marginalised and ardent political activists. Even if such data were reliable, it does not indicate whether or not their neighbourhood influence is either superficial or profound.

These books are powerful records of ‘ordinary’ people like us, taking what is ours and building wondrous things from occupations. They are communications from the 99 per cent to the 1 per cent, saying, ‘Your laws are not our laws’. More than that, they are not just saying – they are doing.

Overland is a not-for-profit magazine with a proud history of supporting writers, and publishing ideas and voices often excluded from other places.

If you like this piece, or support Overland’s work in general, please subscribe or donate.

Anitra Nelson is an honorary associate professor at RMIT University. Her publications include , Marx’s Concept of Money: The God of Commodities and Steering Sustainability in an Urbanizing World: Policy, Practice and Performance.

More by

Comments

  1. Wholesale squatting and the state, family, household dynamic? What are the likely outcomes and changes in respect of gender, education, work etc., I wonder?

  2. Sorry food-for-thought, I only just found out my review — and your comment — had been up here. SEK cover these topics in terms of different nations/cities/cultures and periods of illegality and legality, tolerance and persecution etc.

    There is a great chapter on gender and it is raised by most contributors. The generalisation is that squatters try to be different but often fall into ‘old’ habits, i.e. don’t find change easy! At the same time households are distinctive and political squatters approach their lives as if showing how things might be done better – so that in itself is a good start.

    The role of the state is probably the strongest motif throughout the SEK book. In the end they are facing capitalist states and protection of private property is uppermost and the ultimate name of the game.

    Training is more of a topic than education. Schooling is often still formal public education. Sharing skills and knowledge is definitely one of the stronger positive characteristics of squatting households. Trying to sustain an existence outside the paid workforce is another characteristic and the collective environment seems to make these kinds of efforts easier and more successful.

Leave a Reply to food for thought Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>