Published 12 October 2009 · Main Posts Keynesian Schadenfreude Karen Pickering I found this article a] illuminating, b] devastating and c] a little bit inspiring. Illuminating because it gave me a good snapshot of the body politic in the UK and the government response to the GFC. Devastating because it makes plain that, of course, the Tories will win, and of course, the Labour party will be punished beyond belief.* And, finally, ever so slightly inspiring because it reminds me that just because ‘the Left’ hasn’t adequately or intelligently responded to the GFC yet [has there been a better time since the 1930s to convince people of the central tenets of Marxism for Dummies?], doesn’t mean they can’t or won’t soon. I’ve excerpted the best bits in case you don’t want to click through. This is where the author dissects the absurdity of the Tory position, the utter stupidity of which won’t stop them smashing Labour at the election: Cameron’s main argument – that the economic mess we are in is the result of the failing of big government – is the precise opposite of the truth. The reason for the crisis was not that the state was too active, but that it was too passive. For three decades, from the mid-1970s onwards, regulations on finance were relaxed, markets were unshackled, taxes were cut. Paul Davidson, in his new book The Keynes Solution, puts it this way: “During almost all of the last four decades the public debate over economic policy has been dominated by the belief that if self-interested individuals are permitted to operate in a free market without government interference and regulation, and without worrying about other members of the community, the resulting free market will bring the economy to nirvana.” He goes on to reiterate the point later in the article, with appreciable clarity: Only by the most convoluted reasoning can the crisis of the past two years, and the events that led up it, be described as a failure of big government. On the contrary, it was the deregulation of financial markets championed initially by governments of the right that allowed finance to strip away the prudential controls on its activities. Over to you. Have you been wondering where the bloody hell ‘the Left’ is since the crash? In Australia, we have a right-wing Labor government. New Zealand : Tories. USA : wha’ happen? And Europe is swinging to the hard right again… Are we letting this opportunity slip through our fingers? *Obviously, this will be for many reasons, some warranted [Iraq, Catholic control of Downing St etc] and some due to a crazy kind of reactionary populism [rise of the BNP, holding Gordon Brown responsible for Blair’s insanity etc]. Karen Pickering More by Karen Pickering Overland is a not-for-profit magazine with a proud history of supporting writers, and publishing ideas and voices often excluded from other places. If you like this piece, or support Overland’s work in general, please subscribe or donate. Related articles & Essays First published in Overland Issue 228 25 May 202326 May 2023 · Main Posts The ‘Chinese question’ and colonial capitalism in New Gold Mountain Christy Tan SBS’s New Gold Mountain sets out to recover the history of the Gold Rush from the marginalised perspective of Chinese settlers but instead reinforces the erasure of Indigenous sovereignty. Although celebrated for its multilingual script and diverse representation, the mini-TV series ignores how the settlement of Chinese migrants and their recruitment into colonial capitalism consolidates the ongoing displacement of First Nations peoples. First published in Overland Issue 228 15 February 202322 February 2023 · Main Posts Self-translation and bilingual writing as a transnational writer in the age of machine translation Ouyang Yu To cut a long story short, it all boils down to the need to go as far away from oneself as possible before one realizes another need to come back to reclaim what has been lost in the process while tying the knot of the opposite ends and merging them into a new transformation.