why not here?

I wrote something for Crikey this morning on the stunning successes of the far-Right in the European election. I can’t link to it since the new Crikey website continues to baffle me (like, I’m sure the article is there somewhere but I have no idea where) but here’s the start:

Yorkshire has just returned as its representative in the European Parliament Andrew Brons, a man who cut his political teeth in the National Socialist Movement. Yes, that’s right. National Socialist, as in sieg-heiling, formed-on-Hitler’s-birthday, send- them-all-the-gas-chambers, National Socialist.

In those days, Andrew Brons once overheard another NSM member discussing (as one does) bombing some synagogues. Brons himself equivocated over the plan. “I realise that he is well intentioned,” he explained to a third colleague, “[but] I feel that our public image may suffer considerable damage as a result of these activities. I am however open to correction on this point.”

Today, Brons seems to be more decided. In the recent elections, he campaigned for the British National Party, promising to seek Britain’s withdrawal from the EU. No mention of bombing synagogues — and no mention, either, of the slogans of the National Front, the organisation he led after his NSM days. In that capacity Brons distinguished with an arrest for breaching the peace for shouting “Death to the Jews” and “White Power” in a suburban shopping mall.

Brons’ election, along with that of the BNP leader Nick Griffin, came amidst a swag of successes for fascist and racist groups across the continent.

In Hungary, Jobbik — or Movement for a Better Hungary — won 14.8 per cent of the vote, nearly trebling the result of the ruling socialists. Jobbik openly parades its members in the colours of the Arrow Cross, the party responsible for murdering Hungary’s Jews during the Second World War.

Slovakia saw the triumph of the Slovak National party, which honours the wartime leader Jozef Tiso, executed in 1946 after deporting between 60,000 and 70,000 Jews to concentration camps. In Austria, the combined vote of 17.7 per cent for the anti-immigrant Freedom Party and the Alliance for the Future of Austria came in the context of a resurgent neo-Nazi movement with which both groups have links, while in Denmark, the far-right Danish People’s Party won two seats with 14.4 per cent of the vote.

Geert Wilders — a man recently banned from Britain — was one of the biggest winners, with his Freedom Party moving into second place behind the Christian Democrats. Wilders group, unlike so many of the European rightists, has no historical association with Second World War-era fascist groups, and has built its profile almost exclusively out of bigotry against Muslims. Increasingly, that’s the model that others are following: toning down the anti-Semitism, ramping up the Islamophobia (and, in the east, racism against those forgotten victims of genocide, the gypsies).

Anyway, what I wanted to raise here is the obvious question: why haven’t the far-Right made inroads in Australia? If the BNP can get a million votes in the UK, you’d think there’d be a fascist or right-wing populist group here of some significance. But there isn’t, as far as I know. Obviously, that’s good news. But given Cronulla, given the attacks on the Indian student, it seems odd that there isn’t a little antipodean Nick Griffin somewhere.




Jeff Sparrow

Jeff Sparrow is a Walkley Award-winning writer, broadcaster and former editor of Overland.

More by Jeff Sparrow ›

Overland is a not-for-profit magazine with a proud history of supporting writers, and publishing ideas and voices often excluded from other places.

If you like this piece, or support Overland’s work in general, please subscribe or donate.

Related articles & Essays

Contribute to the conversation

  1. Don't know really. Was just musing. Guess what I might have meant is that Australians are, in general, a pretty demure bunch, aren't they? In countries where the left, or people in general rabble-rouse, raise their voices & riot on the streets ( I mean REAL rioting) everytime the right or mainstream stuffs up or messes with their rights, it's probably easier to whip up hysteria against the left. IE: a very vocal and active left makes for a very vocal and active right. When both are too close together, it's kind of like 'Nyeh, yeah that sucks, but whatever"… Nobody gets off the couch.

    1. Yes. Must say, it’s quite inspiring how the Indian students have been organising, though – utterly confounding all those stereotypes of the demure, compliant Indian abroad.

  2. Yes, it's brilliant. Saw the other Overland's (the cop) response on ABC News to the allegations that Indian students were 'getting it' because they are antoagonistic. Was something like "No, I don't think so at all. They are a very quiet unassuming people". Rings alarm bells of 'Blacks are docile, Asians are smart etc'. You'd think he'd at least be better briefed, even if he might not be culturally sensitive himself. He is tarnishing your magazine's name. its' really unfortunate.

  3. Maxine is right as usual. In a country where political activism means sitting in an armchair pontificating, there is no need for a vocal far right. I mean, your only targets at Janet Albrechtson and Andrew Bolt, and they are too stupid to be bothered with really. I blame the end of free tertiary education in Australia in the 80's. That killed student activism which is often the beating heart of the radical left. Maybe Overland could get involved with organising some demo's and start publishing a few fervent revolutionary polemics, generate a real intense debate?

  4. I think the issue is less the success of a pissy two seats for the BNP, but the total irrelevance of the socialist Left in Britain. What are those guys doing over there, that makes them so on-the-nose electorally?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.